| Title |
Salinisation impacts in life cycle assessment: a review of challenges and options towards their consistent integration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11367-016-1040-x |
| Authors |
Sandra Payen, Claudine Basset-Mens, Montserrat Núñez, Stéphane Follain, Olivier Grünberger, Serge Marlet, Sylvain Perret, Philippe Roux |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 18 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 33 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 15% |
| Engineering | 12 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2016.
All research outputs
#16,223,992
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#821
of 978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,437
of 403,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#31
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.