| Title |
Laparoscopic IPOM versus open sublay technique for elective incisional hernia repair: a registry-based, propensity score-matched comparison of 9907 patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-018-06629-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
F. Köckerling, T. Simon, D. Adolf, D. Köckerling, F. Mayer, W. Reinpold, D. Weyhe, R. Bittner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 3 | 20% |
| Turkey | 2 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Denmark | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 20% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 25 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2019.
All research outputs
#4,287,223
of 25,537,395 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#579
of 6,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,077
of 447,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#20
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,537,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,900 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.