↓ Skip to main content

Using Hands-On and Virtual Laboratories Alone or Together―Which Works Better for Acquiring Knowledge and Skills?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Science Education and Technology, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
Title
Using Hands-On and Virtual Laboratories Alone or Together―Which Works Better for Acquiring Knowledge and Skills?
Published in
Journal of Science Education and Technology, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10956-018-9762-0
Authors

Hasan Ozgur Kapici, Hakan Akcay, Ton de Jong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 217 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 22 10%
Student > Master 22 10%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Researcher 19 9%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 79 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 35 16%
Physics and Astronomy 18 8%
Computer Science 18 8%
Engineering 15 7%
Chemistry 7 3%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 91 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2019.
All research outputs
#13,586,922
of 23,873,054 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Science Education and Technology
#267
of 615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,205
of 444,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Science Education and Technology
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,873,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 615 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.