↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Rheumatology: Quo vadis?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
Title
Clinical Rheumatology: Quo vadis?
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10067-018-04404-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos Pineda

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2019.
All research outputs
#4,248,133
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#629
of 3,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,976
of 438,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#19
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.