↓ Skip to main content

Tumor Budding is a Valuable Diagnostic Parameter in Prediction of Disease Progression of Endometrial Endometrioid Carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Pathology & Oncology Research, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Tumor Budding is a Valuable Diagnostic Parameter in Prediction of Disease Progression of Endometrial Endometrioid Carcinoma
Published in
Pathology & Oncology Research, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12253-018-0554-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ji Young Park, Dae Gy Hong, Gun Oh Chong, Ji Y. Park

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 19%
Other 2 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Librarian 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 9 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 33%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 12 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2019.
All research outputs
#15,555,964
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from Pathology & Oncology Research
#305
of 725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,571
of 438,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pathology & Oncology Research
#11
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 725 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.