| Title |
Effects of montelukast on human nasal mucosa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00405-018-05274-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hsing-Won Wang, Jih-Chin Lee, Pei-Chuan Wu, Yueng-Hsiang Chu, Yuan-Yung Lin, Li-Hsiang Cheng |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 21% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 14% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2019.
All research outputs
#15,555,964
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#1,218
of 3,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,571
of 438,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#12
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.