| Title |
Functional Communication Training for Multiple Reinforcers: an Evaluation of Isolated Control Following a Synthesized Context
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Behavior Analysis in Practice, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40617-018-00320-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Megan A. Boyle, Shannie M. Stamper, Elizabeth A. Donaldson, Kaitlin S. Curtis, Kara L. Forck, Melissa A. Shrimplin, Allie C. Barsness, Christina Oller |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 9 | 41% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2019.
All research outputs
#5,837,083
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Analysis in Practice
#182
of 563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,861
of 438,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Analysis in Practice
#11
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.