| Title |
Differential patient responses to spinal manipulative therapy and their relation to spinal degeneration and post-treatment changes in disc diffusion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Spine Journal, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00586-018-5851-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arnold Y. L. Wong, Eric C. Parent, Sukhvinder S. Dhillon, Narasimha Prasad, Dino Samartzis, Gregory N. Kawchuk |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 22% |
| Canada | 4 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 74% |
| Scientists | 5 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 19% |
| Unknown | 22 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 24 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,849,579
of 25,466,764 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#153
of 5,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,024
of 446,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#6
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,466,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,288 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.