↓ Skip to main content

Targets of Balancing Selection in the Human Genome

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Biology and Evolution, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
245 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
361 Mendeley
citeulike
13 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Targets of Balancing Selection in the Human Genome
Published in
Molecular Biology and Evolution, August 2009
DOI 10.1093/molbev/msp190
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aida M. Andrés, Melissa J. Hubisz, Amit Indap, Dara G. Torgerson, Jeremiah D. Degenhardt, Adam R. Boyko, Ryan N. Gutenkunst, Thomas J. White, Eric D. Green, Carlos D. Bustamante, Andrew G. Clark, Rasmus Nielsen

Abstract

Balancing selection is potentially an important biological force for maintaining advantageous genetic diversity in populations, including variation that is responsible for long-term adaptation to the environment. By serving as a means to maintain genetic variation, it may be particularly relevant to maintaining phenotypic variation in natural populations. Nevertheless, its prevalence and specific targets in the human genome remain largely unknown. We have analyzed the patterns of diversity and divergence of 13,400 genes in two human populations using an unbiased single-nucleotide polymorphism data set, a genome-wide approach, and a method that incorporates demography in neutrality tests. We identified an unbiased catalog of genes with signatures of long-term balancing selection, which includes immunity genes as well as genes encoding keratins and membrane channels; the catalog also shows enrichment in functional categories involved in cellular structure. Patterns are mostly concordant in the two populations, with a small fraction of genes showing population-specific signatures of selection. Power considerations indicate that our findings represent a subset of all targets in the genome, suggesting that although balancing selection may not have an obvious impact on a large proportion of human genes, it is a key force affecting the evolution of a number of genes in humans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 361 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 20 6%
Germany 5 1%
Brazil 4 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 319 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 114 32%
Researcher 79 22%
Student > Master 35 10%
Professor 23 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 21 6%
Other 59 16%
Unknown 30 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 223 62%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 16%
Mathematics 7 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 2%
Environmental Science 4 1%
Other 24 7%
Unknown 39 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2018.
All research outputs
#12,852,228
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Biology and Evolution
#3,756
of 4,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,098
of 90,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Biology and Evolution
#36
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,918 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.