↓ Skip to main content

Simultaneous assay of every Salmonella Typhi gene using one million transposon mutants

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Research, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
544 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
763 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Simultaneous assay of every Salmonella Typhi gene using one million transposon mutants
Published in
Genome Research, October 2009
DOI 10.1101/gr.097097.109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gemma C. Langridge, Minh-Duy Phan, Daniel J. Turner, Timothy T. Perkins, Leopold Parts, Jana Haase, Ian Charles, Duncan J. Maskell, Sarah E. Peters, Gordon Dougan, John Wain, Julian Parkhill, A. Keith Turner

Abstract

Very high-throughput sequencing technologies need to be matched by high-throughput functional studies if we are to make full use of the current explosion in genome sequences. We have generated a very large bacterial mutant pool, consisting of an estimated 1.1 million transposon mutants and we have used genomic DNA from this mutant pool, and Illumina nucleotide sequencing to prime from the transposon and sequence into the adjacent target DNA. With this method, which we have called TraDIS (transposon directed insertion-site sequencing), we have been able to map 370,000 unique transposon insertion sites to the Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi chromosome. The unprecedented density and resolution of mapped insertion sites, an average of one every 13 base pairs, has allowed us to assay simultaneously every gene in the genome for essentiality and generate a genome-wide list of candidate essential genes. In addition, the semiquantitative nature of the assay allowed us to identify genes that are advantageous and those that are disadvantageous for growth under standard laboratory conditions. Comparison of the mutant pool following growth in the presence or absence of ox bile enabled every gene to be assayed for its contribution toward bile tolerance, a trait required of any enteric bacterium and for carriage of S. Typhi in the gall bladder. This screen validated our hypothesis that we can simultaneously assay every gene in the genome to identify niche-specific essential genes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 763 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 14 2%
United Kingdom 10 1%
Canada 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Mexico 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Other 12 2%
Unknown 709 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 210 28%
Researcher 167 22%
Student > Bachelor 82 11%
Student > Master 66 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 28 4%
Other 102 13%
Unknown 108 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 340 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 156 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 58 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 1%
Other 47 6%
Unknown 131 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2024.
All research outputs
#935,786
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Genome Research
#334
of 4,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,391
of 105,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Research
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.