| Title |
Contrasting ecological impacts of geographically close invasive populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00442-018-04333-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C. Evangelista, J. Cucherousset, A. Lecerf |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 33% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Zambia | 1 | 7% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 7% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
| Scientists | 4 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 18% |
| Researcher | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 15% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 50% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,982,140
of 24,137,435 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#735
of 4,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,193
of 445,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#20
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,137,435 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.