↓ Skip to main content

The influence of obesity-related factors in the etiology of renal cell carcinoma—A mendelian randomization study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS Medicine, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
40 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The influence of obesity-related factors in the etiology of renal cell carcinoma—A mendelian randomization study
Published in
PLOS Medicine, January 2019
DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002724
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mattias Johansson, Robert Carreras-Torres, Ghislaine Scelo, Mark P Purdue, Daniela Mariosa, David C Muller, Nicolas J Timpson, Philip C Haycock, Kevin M Brown, Zhaoming Wang, Yuanqing Ye, Jonathan N Hofmann, Matthieu Foll, Valerie Gaborieau, Mitchell J Machiela, Leandro M Colli, Peng Li, Jean-Guillaume Garnier, Helene Blanche, Anne Boland, Laurie Burdette, Egor Prokhortchouk, Konstantin G Skryabin, Meredith Yeager, Sanja Radojevic-Skodric, Simona Ognjanovic, Lenka Foretova, Ivana Holcatova, Vladimir Janout, Dana Mates, Anush Mukeriya, Stefan Rascu, David Zaridze, Vladimir Bencko, Cezary Cybulski, Eleonora Fabianova, Viorel Jinga, Jolanta Lissowska, Jan Lubinski, Marie Navratilova, Peter Rudnai, Simone Benhamou, Geraldine Cancel-Tassin, Olivier Cussenot, Elisabete Weiderpass, Börje Ljungberg, Raviprakash Tumkur Sitaram, Christel Häggström, Fiona Bruinsma, Susan J Jordan, Gianluca Severi, Ingrid Winship, Kristian Hveem, Lars J Vatten, Tony Fletcher, Susanna C Larsson, Alicja Wolk, Rosamonde E Banks, Peter J Selby, Douglas F Easton, Gabriella Andreotti, Laura E Beane Freeman, Stella Koutros, Satu Männistö, Stephanie Weinstein, Peter E Clark, Todd L Edwards, Loren Lipworth, Susan M Gapstur, Victoria L Stevens, Hallie Carol, Matthew L Freedman, Mark M Pomerantz, Eunyoung Cho, Kathryn M Wilson, J Michael Gaziano, Howard D Sesso, Neal D Freedman, Alexander S Parker, Jeanette E Eckel-Passow, Wen-Yi Huang, Richard J Kahnoski, Brian R Lane, Sabrina L Noyes, David Petillo, Bin Tean Teh, Ulrike Peters, Emily White, Garnet L Anderson, Lisa Johnson, Juhua Luo, Julie Buring, I-Min Lee, Wong-Ho Chow, Lee E Moore, Timothy Eisen, Marc Henrion, James Larkin, Poulami Barman, Bradley C Leibovich, Toni K Choueiri, G Mark Lathrop, Jean-Francois Deleuze, Marc Gunter, James D McKay, Xifeng Wu, Richard S Houlston, Stephen J Chanock, Caroline Relton, J Brent Richards, Richard M Martin, George Davey Smith, Paul Brennan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 132 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 18%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Student > Master 8 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 5%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 48 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Computer Science 3 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 60 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2022.
All research outputs
#579,048
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#933
of 5,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,149
of 446,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#18
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 77.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.