| Title |
Hydration, dehydration, underhydration, optimal hydration: are we barking up the wrong tree?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Nutrition, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00394-018-01889-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stavros A. Kavouras |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 30% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 35% |
| Members of the public | 7 | 35% |
| Scientists | 6 | 30% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 18 | 20% |
| Unknown | 27 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 13 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 30 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,153,184
of 25,081,419 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#318
of 2,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,759
of 449,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#5
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,081,419 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.