| Title |
Ethical issues in human germline gene editing: a perspective from China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Monash Bioethics Review, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40592-018-0091-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Di Zhang, Reidar K. Lie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 21 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 20 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2019.
All research outputs
#14,149,828
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from Monash Bioethics Review
#80
of 149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,359
of 437,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Monash Bioethics Review
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.