↓ Skip to main content

Rivaroxaban versus standard anticoagulation for acute venous thromboembolism in childhood. Design of the EINSTEIN-Jr phase III study

Overview of attention for article published in Thrombosis Journal, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Rivaroxaban versus standard anticoagulation for acute venous thromboembolism in childhood. Design of the EINSTEIN-Jr phase III study
Published in
Thrombosis Journal, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12959-018-0188-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthonie W. A. Lensing, Christoph Male, Guy Young, Dagmar Kubitza, Gili Kenet, M. Patricia Massicotte, Anthony Chan, Angelo C. Molinari, Ulrike Nowak-Goettl, Ákos F. Pap, Ivet Adalbo, William T. Smith, Amy Mason, Kirstin Thelen, Scott D. Berkowitz, Mark Crowther, Stephan Schmidt, Victoria Price, Martin H. Prins, Paul Monagle

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 17 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 19 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,455,627
of 24,527,858 outputs
Outputs from Thrombosis Journal
#126
of 394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,179
of 444,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thrombosis Journal
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,527,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.