| Title |
Development of national consensus statements on food labelling interpretation and protein allocation in a low phenylalanine diet for PKU
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-018-0950-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sharon Evans, Suzanne Ford, Sarah Adam, Sandra Adams, Jane Ash, Catherine Ashmore, Gillian Caine, Rachel Carruthers, Sarah Cawtherley, Satnam Chahal, Anne Clark, Barbara Cochrane, Anne Daly, Karen Dines, Marjorie Dixon, Carolyn Dunlop, Charlotte Ellerton, Moira French, Lisa Gaff, Cerys Gingell, Diane Green, Joanna Gribben, Anne Grimsley, Paula Hallam, Una Hendroff, Melanie Hill, Rachel Hoban, Sarah Howe, Inderdip Hunjan, Kit Kaalund, Eimear Kelleher, Farzana Khan, Steve Kitchen, Karen Lang, Sharan Lowry, Jo Males, Georgina Martin, Nicola McStravick, Avril Micciche, Camille Newby, Claire Nicol, Rachel Pereira, Louise Robertson, Kathleen Ross, Emma Simpson, Kath Singleton, Rachel Skeath, Jacqueline Stafford, Allyson Terry, Ruth Thom, Alison Tooke, Karen vanWyk, Fiona White, Lucy White, Anita MacDonald |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 26% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2019.
All research outputs
#18,661,637
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#2,167
of 2,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#325,599
of 438,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#40
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.