↓ Skip to main content

How to Fail a Scale: Reflections on a Failed Attempt to Assess Resilience

Overview of attention for article published in Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How to Fail a Scale: Reflections on a Failed Attempt to Assess Resilience
Published in
Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11013-018-9617-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily Mendenhall, Andrew Wooyoung Kim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 22 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 22%
Social Sciences 9 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 26 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,677,891
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry
#61
of 622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,024
of 444,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.