| Title |
Identifying potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people with dementia: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00228-018-02612-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deborah Hukins, Una Macleod, Jason W. Boland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 154 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 67 | 44% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 3% |
| Mexico | 4 | 3% |
| Argentina | 3 | 2% |
| Chile | 3 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 1% |
| Peru | 2 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 61 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 134 | 87% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 10% |
| Scientists | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 163 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 20% |
| Unknown | 57 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 25% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 24 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 61 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2020.
All research outputs
#447,193
of 25,711,194 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#19
of 2,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,928
of 447,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.