Title |
Benefit Transfer Challenges: Perspectives from U.S. Practitioners
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental and Resource Economics, February 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10640-017-0207-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stephen Newbold, R. David Simpson, D. Matthew Massey, Matthew T. Heberling, William Wheeler, Joel Corona, Julie Hewitt |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 19% |
Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 14 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 15 | 29% |
Engineering | 4 | 8% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 21 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,494,737
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Environmental and Resource Economics
#262
of 988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,982
of 333,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental and Resource Economics
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.