You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The role of transforming growth factor β1 in the vascular system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cardiovascular Pathology, January 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.carpath.2004.11.005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan Ghosh, Michael O. Murphy, Neill Turner, Nadeem Khwaja, Anastassi Halka, Cay M. Kielty, Michael G. Walker |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 33% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 11% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2013.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Pathology
#231
of 623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,856
of 151,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Pathology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them