| Title |
Medication use in older patients and age-blind approach: narrative literature review (insufficient evidence on the efficacy and safety of drugs in older age, frequent use of PIMs and polypharmacy, and underuse of highly beneficial nonpharmacological strategies)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00228-018-2603-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniela Fialová, Blanca Laffon, Valentina Marinković, Ljiljana Tasić, Peter Doro, Gyӧngyver Sόos, Jorge Mota, Soner Dogan, Jovana Brkić, João Paulo Teixeira, Vanessa Valdiglesias, Solange Costa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 8 | 53% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 164 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 8% |
| Researcher | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 34 | 21% |
| Unknown | 46 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 24 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 59 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,228,720
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#261
of 2,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,383
of 437,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#7
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.