| Title |
Health care provider perceptions of fertility preservation barriers and challenges with transgender patients and families: qualitative responses to an international survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10815-018-1395-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amy C. Tishelman, Megan E. Sutter, Diane Chen, Amani Sampson, Leena Nahata, Victoria D. Kolbuck, Gwendolyn P. Quinn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 32% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| Philippines | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 87% |
| Scientists | 3 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 162 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 17% |
| Unknown | 58 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 14% |
| Psychology | 21 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 59 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,354,993
of 25,658,139 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#67
of 1,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,919
of 448,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,139 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.