↓ Skip to main content

Establishing causation in climate litigation: admissibility and reliability

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Establishing causation in climate litigation: admissibility and reliability
Published in
Climatic Change, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10584-018-2362-4
Authors

Tobias Pfrommer, Timo Goeschl, Alexander Proelss, Martin Carrier, Johannes Lenhard, Henrike Martin, Ulrike Niemeier, Hauke Schmidt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 16%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Unspecified 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 17 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 27%
Environmental Science 4 9%
Arts and Humanities 3 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 7%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 18 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2019.
All research outputs
#15,029,014
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#5,317
of 5,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,285
of 437,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#59
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.