| Title |
Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00268-018-04896-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ka Ting Ng, Azlan Kok Vui Tsia, Vanessa Yu Ling Chong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| South Africa | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 24% |
| Scientists | 3 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 32 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 34% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 33 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,032,414
of 24,592,508 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#584
of 4,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,241
of 446,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#11
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,592,508 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,495 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.