You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Do geographically isolated wetlands influence landscape functions?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1512650113 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew J. Cohen, Irena F. Creed, Laurie Alexander, Nandita B. Basu, Aram J. K. Calhoun, Christopher Craft, Ellen D’Amico, Edward DeKeyser, Laurie Fowler, Heather E. Golden, James W. Jawitz, Peter Kalla, L. Katherine Kirkman, Charles R. Lane, Megan Lang, Scott G. Leibowitz, David Bruce Lewis, John Marton, Daniel L. McLaughlin, David M. Mushet, Hadas Raanan-Kiperwas, Mark C. Rains, Lora Smith, Susan C. Walls |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 38% |
| United States | 3 | 38% |
| Sweden | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 481 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 473 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 91 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 90 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 76 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 6% |
| Other | 72 | 15% |
| Unknown | 85 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 174 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 94 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 50 | 10% |
| Engineering | 28 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 16 | 3% |
| Unknown | 116 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,114,776
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#16,611
of 104,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,072
of 412,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#304
of 880 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 880 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.