↓ Skip to main content

Blastocystis hominis and Dientamoeba fragilis in patients fulfilling irritable bowel syndrome criteria

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Blastocystis hominis and Dientamoeba fragilis in patients fulfilling irritable bowel syndrome criteria
Published in
Parasitology Research, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00436-010-1918-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Javed Yakoob, Wasim Jafri, Mohammad Asim Beg, Zaigham Abbas, Shagufta Naz, Muhammad Islam, Rustam Khan

Abstract

Studies have suggested a possible role for Blastocystis hominis and Dientamoeba fragilis in the etiology of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We studied the prevalence of B. hominis and D. fragilis in patients with IBS-diarrhea (IBS-D). Three hundred and thirty patients were enrolled, 171 (52%) with IBS-D and 159 (48%) were controls, respectively. Stool microscopy, culture, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for B. hominis and D. fragilis were done. B. hominis was positive by stool microscopy in 49% (83/171) of IBS compared to 24% (27/159) in control (p < 0.001). B. hominis culture was positive in 53% (90/171) in IBS compared to 16% (25/159) in control (p < 0.001). B. hominis PCR was positive in 44% (75/171) in IBS compared to 21% (33/159) in control (p < 0.001). D. fragilis microscopy was positive in 3.5% (6/171) in IBS-D compared to 0.6% (1/159) in control (p = 0.123). D. fragilis culture was positive in 4% (7/171) in IBS compared to 1.3% (2/159) in control (p = 0.176). D. fragilis PCR was positive in 4% (6/171) in IBS-D compared to 0% (0/159) in control (p = 0.030). B. hominis is common, while D. fragilis was less prevalent in our patients with IBS-D. B. hominis and D. fragilis culture had a better yield compared to stool microscopy and PCR.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 100 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Bachelor 17 16%
Student > Master 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 17 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 4%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 15 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2016.
All research outputs
#4,569,419
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#260
of 3,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,381
of 95,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,767 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.