| Title |
The modulation effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognitive function in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Neuroscience, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12868-018-0484-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ying Xu, Zhijie Qiu, Jingfang Zhu, Jiao Liu, Jingsong Wu, Jing Tao, Lidian Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| Egypt | 1 | 13% |
| Italy | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 139 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Researcher | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Professor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 19% |
| Unknown | 57 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 19 | 14% |
| Psychology | 18 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 69 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2019.
All research outputs
#6,903,305
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#327
of 1,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,816
of 438,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,252 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.