↓ Skip to main content

The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
993 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
368 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women
Published in
Osteoporosis International, February 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00198-007-0343-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. A. Kanis, A. Oden, O. Johnell, H. Johansson, C. De Laet, J. Brown, P. Burckhardt, C. Cooper, C. Christiansen, S. Cummings, J. A. Eisman, S. Fujiwara, C. Glüer, D. Goltzman, D. Hans, M.-A. Krieg, A. La Croix, E. McCloskey, D. Mellstrom, L. J. Melton, H. Pols, J. Reeve, K. Sanders, A-M. Schott, A. Silman, D. Torgerson, T. van Staa, N. B. Watts, N. Yoshimura

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 368 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 355 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 15%
Researcher 53 14%
Student > Master 46 13%
Other 29 8%
Student > Bachelor 28 8%
Other 86 23%
Unknown 72 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 159 43%
Engineering 22 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 3%
Other 42 11%
Unknown 96 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2017.
All research outputs
#3,293,687
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#554
of 3,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,632
of 76,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.