↓ Skip to main content

Avoiding selection bias in metabolomics studies: a tutorial

Overview of attention for article published in Metabolomics, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Avoiding selection bias in metabolomics studies: a tutorial
Published in
Metabolomics, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11306-018-1463-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. C. Boone, S. le Cessie, K. Willems van Dijk, R. de Mutsert, D. O. Mook-Kanamori

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 20%
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Master 3 12%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 7 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 16%
Chemistry 3 12%
Mathematics 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 10 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,672,024
of 25,389,116 outputs
Outputs from Metabolomics
#183
of 1,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,362
of 451,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metabolomics
#7
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,116 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.