You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ISA software suite: supporting standards-compliant experimental annotation and enabling curation at the community level
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bioinformatics, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq415 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philippe Rocca-Serra, Marco Brandizi, Eamonn Maguire, Nataliya Sklyar, Chris Taylor, Kimberly Begley, Dawn Field, Stephen Harris, Winston Hide, Oliver Hofmann, Steffen Neumann, Peter Sterk, Weida Tong, Susanna-Assunta Sansone |
| Abstract |
The first open source software suite for experimentalists and curators that (i) assists in the annotation and local management of experimental metadata from high-throughput studies employing one or a combination of omics and other technologies; (ii) empowers users to uptake community-defined checklists and ontologies; and (iii) facilitates submission to international public repositories. Availability and Implementation: Software, documentation, case studies and implementations at http://www.isa-tools.org. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 25% |
| China | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 4% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% |
| France | 3 | 1% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Unknown | 159 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 81 | 37% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 20% |
| Other | 25 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 108 | 49% |
| Computer Science | 39 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 11% |
| Unknown | 17 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,811,133
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Bioinformatics
#1,017
of 12,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,136
of 103,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioinformatics
#9
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.