| Title |
Systematic review of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-018-0842-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joanna C. Moullin, Kelsey S. Dickson, Nicole A. Stadnick, Borsika Rabin, Gregory A. Aarons |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 23 | 24% |
| Australia | 10 | 11% |
| Canada | 7 | 7% |
| Ireland | 5 | 5% |
| Norway | 4 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Sri Lanka | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Serbia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 36 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 45 | 48% |
| Members of the public | 34 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 708 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 708 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 116 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 83 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 70 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 8% |
| Other | 29 | 4% |
| Other | 118 | 17% |
| Unknown | 234 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 106 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 87 | 12% |
| Psychology | 79 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 68 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 83 | 12% |
| Unknown | 274 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2023.
All research outputs
#534,664
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#38
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,961
of 448,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#2
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.