| Title |
A systematic review of the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of online supportive care interventions targeting men with a history of prostate cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cancer Survivorship, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11764-018-0729-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cynthia C. Forbes, Amy Finlay, Megan McIntosh, Shihab Siddiquee, Camille E. Short |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 24% |
| Australia | 3 | 14% |
| Canada | 2 | 10% |
| Turkey | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| Czechia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 67% |
| Scientists | 5 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 142 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 18% |
| Unknown | 49 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 14% |
| Psychology | 17 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 53 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,171,347
of 24,953,268 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#141
of 1,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,993
of 448,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,953,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.