↓ Skip to main content

Pro-autophagic signal induction by bacterial pore-forming toxins

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Microbiology and Immunology, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Pro-autophagic signal induction by bacterial pore-forming toxins
Published in
Medical Microbiology and Immunology, May 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00430-010-0163-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole Kloft, Claudia Neukirch, Wiesia Bobkiewicz, Gunnaporn Veerachato, Tim Busch, Gisela von Hoven, Klaus Boller, Matthias Husmann

Abstract

Pore-forming toxins (PFT) comprise a large, structurally heterogeneous group of bacterial protein toxins. Nucleated target cells mount complex responses which allow them to survive moderate membrane damage by PFT. Autophagy has recently been implicated in responses to various PFT, but how this process is triggered is not known, and the significance of the phenomenon is not understood. Here, we show that S. aureus α-toxin, Vibrio cholerae cytolysin, streptolysin O and E. coli haemolysin activate two pathways leading to autophagy. The first pathway is triggered via AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). AMPK is a major energy sensor which induces autophagy by inhibiting the target of rapamycin complex 1 (TORC1) in response to a drop of the cellular ATP/AMP-ratio, as is also observed in response to membrane perforation. The second pathway is activated by the conserved eIF2α-kinase GCN2, which causes global translational arrest and promotes autophagy in response to starvation. The latter could be accounted for by impaired amino acid transport into target cells. Notably, PKR, an eIF2α-kinase which has been implicated in autophagy induction during viral infection, was also activated upon membrane perforation, and evidence was obtained that phosphorylation of eIF2α is required for the accumulation of autophagosomes in α-toxin-treated cells. Treatment with 3-methyl-adenine inhibited autophagy and disrupted the ability of cells to recover from sublethal attack by S. aureus α-toxin. We propose that PFT induce pro-autophagic signals through membrane perforation-dependent nutrient and energy depletion, and that an important function of autophagy in this context is to maintain metabolic homoeostasis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
France 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Unknown 76 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 20%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 6 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 6 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2010.
All research outputs
#16,049,105
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Medical Microbiology and Immunology
#441
of 627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,684
of 97,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Microbiology and Immunology
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.