| Title |
Comparison of digital video surveys with visual aerial surveys for bird monitoring at sea
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ornithology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10336-018-1622-4 |
| Authors |
Ramūnas Žydelis, Monika Dorsch, Stefan Heinänen, Georg Nehls, Felix Weiss |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 28% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Latvia | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 75% |
| Scientists | 6 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 17 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 27% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,465,207
of 25,262,379 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ornithology
#99
of 1,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,495
of 448,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ornithology
#4
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,262,379 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,792 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.