↓ Skip to main content

Cryospheric hazards and risk perceptions in the Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) National Park and Buffer Zone, Nepal

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Cryospheric hazards and risk perceptions in the Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) National Park and Buffer Zone, Nepal
Published in
Natural Hazards, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11069-018-3560-0
Authors

Sonam Futi Sherpa, Milan Shrestha, Hallie Eakin, Christopher G. Boone

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 15%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 30 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 18 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 11%
Social Sciences 7 8%
Engineering 7 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 35 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,381,089
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#204
of 1,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,320
of 437,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.