| Title |
Study protocol of a randomised controlled trial to examine the impact of a complex intervention in pre-frail older adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40520-018-1106-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruth Teh, Ngaire Kerse, Debra L. Waters, Leigh Hale, Avinesh Pillai, Evelingi Leilua, Esther Tay, Anna Rolleston, Richard Edlin, Eruera Maxted, Claire Heppenstall, Martin J. Connolly |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 30% |
| New Zealand | 6 | 30% |
| Papua New Guinea | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 50% |
| Scientists | 7 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 193 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 9% |
| Researcher | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 15% |
| Unknown | 84 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 13% |
| Psychology | 10 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 95 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2019.
All research outputs
#2,447,825
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#151
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,919
of 446,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#8
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.