↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Female Participation as Top-Producing Authors, Editors, and Editorial Board Members in Educational Psychology Journals from 2009 to 2016

Overview of attention for article published in Educational Psychology Review, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Correction to: Female Participation as Top-Producing Authors, Editors, and Editorial Board Members in Educational Psychology Journals from 2009 to 2016
Published in
Educational Psychology Review, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10648-018-09459-9
Authors

Hannah K. Greenbaum, Hayden L. Goodsir, M. Cecil Smith, Daniel H. Robinson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 40%
Lecturer 1 20%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 40%
Psychology 1 20%
Linguistics 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2019.
All research outputs
#5,837,744
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from Educational Psychology Review
#328
of 644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,594
of 435,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Psychology Review
#18
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.