| Title |
Guidelines to the Practice of Anesthesia – Revised Edition 2019
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12630-018-1248-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gregory Dobson, Lorraine Chow, Alana Flexman, Heather Hurdle, Matthew Kurrek, Claude Laflamme, Michel-Antoine Perrault, Kathryn Sparrow, Shean Stacey, Pieter Swart, Michael Wong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 10 | 23% |
| Argentina | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Mexico | 2 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 2% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 77% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 9% |
| Scientists | 3 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,405,477
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#148
of 2,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,395
of 431,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#5
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,899 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.