↓ Skip to main content

Freshwater Methane Emissions Offset the Continental Carbon Sink

Overview of attention for article published in Science, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
1215 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
926 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Freshwater Methane Emissions Offset the Continental Carbon Sink
Published in
Science, January 2011
DOI 10.1126/science.1196808
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Bastviken, Lars J. Tranvik, John A. Downing, Patrick M. Crill, Alex Enrich-Prast

Abstract

Inland waters (lakes, reservoirs, streams, and rivers) are often substantial methane (CH(4)) sources in the terrestrial landscape. They are, however, not yet well integrated in global greenhouse gas (GHG) budgets. Data from 474 freshwater ecosystems and the most recent global water area estimates indicate that freshwaters emit at least 103 teragrams of CH(4) year(-1), corresponding to 0.65 petagrams of C as carbon dioxide (CO(2)) equivalents year(-1), offsetting 25% of the estimated land carbon sink. Thus, the continental GHG sink may be considerably overestimated, and freshwaters need to be recognized as important in the global carbon cycle.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 926 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 17 2%
United Kingdom 7 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 880 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 224 24%
Researcher 153 17%
Student > Master 145 16%
Student > Bachelor 76 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 57 6%
Other 122 13%
Unknown 149 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 323 35%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 149 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 146 16%
Engineering 32 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 2%
Other 55 6%
Unknown 203 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,356,938
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Science
#22,642
of 83,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,789
of 195,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#104
of 391 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 391 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.