You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genetics of white matter development: A DTI study of 705 twins and their siblings aged 12 to 29
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
NeuroImage, October 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.015 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ming-Chang Chiang, Katie L. McMahon, Greig I. de Zubicaray, Nicholas G. Martin, Ian Hickie, Arthur W. Toga, Margaret J. Wright, Paul M. Thompson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 240 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 24% |
| Researcher | 59 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 21 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 52 | 20% |
| Unknown | 28 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 72 | 27% |
| Neuroscience | 49 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 11% |
| Unknown | 48 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2012.
All research outputs
#3,503,467
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#3,030
of 12,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,018
of 112,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#25
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.