↓ Skip to main content

Six versus eight doses of rituximab in patients with aggressive B cell lymphoma receiving six cycles of CHOP: results from the “Positron Emission Tomography-Guided Therapy of Aggressive Non-Hodgkin…

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Hematology, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Six versus eight doses of rituximab in patients with aggressive B cell lymphoma receiving six cycles of CHOP: results from the “Positron Emission Tomography-Guided Therapy of Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas” (PETAL) trial
Published in
Annals of Hematology, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00277-018-3578-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Hüttmann, Jan Rekowski, Stefan P. Müller, Bernd Hertenstein, Christiane Franzius, Rolf Mesters, Matthias Weckesser, Frank Kroschinsky, Jörg Kotzerke, Arnold Ganser, Frank M. Bengel, Paul La Rosée, Martin Freesmeyer, Heinz-Gert Höffkes, Andreas Hertel, Dirk Behringer, Gabriele Prange-Krex, Martin Griesshammer, Jens Holzinger, Stefan Wilop, Thomas Krohn, Aruna Raghavachar, Georg Maschmeyer, Ingo Brink, Roland Schroers, Tobias Gaska, Helga Bernhard, Aristoteles Giagounidis, Jochen Schütte, Ariane Dienst, Hubertus Hautzel, Ralph Naumann, Alfred Klein, Dennis Hahn, Gabriele Pöpperl, Matthias Grube, Jörg Marienhagen, Andreas Schwarzer, Lars Kurch, Thomas Höhler, Heike Steiniger, Holger Nückel, Thomas Südhoff, Wolfgang Römer, Marcus Brinkmann, Claudia Ose, Ferras Alashkar, Christine Schmitz, Jan Dürig, Dieter Hoelzer, Karl-Heinz Jöckel, Wolfram Klapper, Ulrich Dührsen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Professor 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 13 23%
Unknown 16 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 46%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 19 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,627,930
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Hematology
#213
of 2,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,578
of 436,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Hematology
#8
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,200 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.