| Title |
Factors that influence the sustainability of structured allied health journal clubs: a qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12909-018-1436-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachel Wenke, Katherine O’Shea, Jo Hilder, Rae Thomas, Sharon Mickan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 33% |
| Norway | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Scientists | 4 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Librarian | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 28% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 20% |
| Unknown | 16 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2020.
All research outputs
#5,488,044
of 25,756,531 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,002
of 4,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,992
of 448,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#32
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.