| Title |
Prophylactic sivelestat for esophagectomy and in-hospital mortality: a propensity score-matched analysis of claims database
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Anesthesia, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00540-018-2602-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chikashi Takeda, Masato Takeuchi, Yohei Kawasaki, Hiroshi Yonekura, Isao Nahara, Aki Kuwauchi, Satomi Yoshida, Shiro Tanaka, Koji Kawakami |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 15% |
| Researcher | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2019.
All research outputs
#16,439,816
of 24,213,825 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anesthesia
#463
of 893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,466
of 443,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anesthesia
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,213,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 893 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.