| Title |
Should rehabilitated hedgehogs be released in winter? A comparison of survival, nest use and weight change in wild and rescued animals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Wildlife Research, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10344-018-1244-4 |
| Authors |
Richard W. Yarnell, Joanne Surgey, Adam Grogan, Richard Thompson, Kate Davies, Christina Kimbrough, Dawn M. Scott |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 41% |
| France | 2 | 7% |
| Comoros | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 70% |
| Scientists | 5 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 26% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 16% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,757,889
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#79
of 1,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,020
of 446,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#4
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.