↓ Skip to main content

Optimal extent of resection for glioblastoma according to site, extension, and size: a population-based study in the temozolomide era

Overview of attention for article published in Neurosurgical Review, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Optimal extent of resection for glioblastoma according to site, extension, and size: a population-based study in the temozolomide era
Published in
Neurosurgical Review, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10143-018-01071-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi-Jun Kim, David J. Lee, Chul-Kee Park, In Ah Kim

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Professor 3 13%
Other 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 8 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 39%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unknown 11 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2019.
All research outputs
#20,549,510
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from Neurosurgical Review
#552
of 637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#370,179
of 435,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurosurgical Review
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 637 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.