Title |
The effect of local anesthetic continuous wound infusion for the prevention of postoperative pneumonia after on-pump cardiac surgery with sternotomy: the STERNOCAT randomized clinical trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00134-018-5497-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Julien Amour, Bernard Cholley, Alexandre Ouattara, Dan Longrois, Pascal Leprince, Jean-Luc Fellahi, Bruno Riou, Sarah Hariri, Christian Latrémouille, Alain Rémy, Sophie Provenchère, Aude Carillion, Paul Achouh, Louis Labrousse, Alexy Tran Dinh, Nora Ait Hamou, Ahmed Charfeddine, Alexandre Lafourcade, David Hajage, Adrien Bouglé |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 13% |
Hungary | 1 | 13% |
South Africa | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 24 | 51% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 28% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 27 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2019.
All research outputs
#6,388,038
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,627
of 5,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,083
of 437,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#56
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.