| Title |
Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI for operability assessment in patients with colorectal cancer and peritoneal metastases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Imaging, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40644-018-0187-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Raphaëla Carmen Dresen, Sofie De Vuysere, Frederik De Keyzer, Eric Van Cutsem, Hans Prenen, Ragna Vanslembrouck, Gert De Hertogh, Albert Wolthuis, André D’Hoore, Vincent Vandecaveye |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| Austria | 1 | 20% |
| France | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 18% |
| Unknown | 13 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,942,734
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Imaging
#105
of 674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,072
of 444,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Imaging
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 674 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.