↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Abstracts of the MASCC/ISOO 2016 Annual Meeting

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
Title
Correction to: Abstracts of the MASCC/ISOO 2016 Annual Meeting
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00520-018-4608-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Irina Bespalova

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2019.
All research outputs
#5,837,744
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#1,362
of 4,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,153
of 437,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#37
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.