| Title |
An updated systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of therapies for metastatic breast cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10549-018-05099-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anagha Gogate, Jason S. Rotter, Justin G. Trogdon, Ke Meng, Christopher D. Baggett, Katherine E. Reeder-Hayes, Stephanie B. Wheeler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 18% |
| Unknown | 18 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 29% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 21 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2019.
All research outputs
#18,663,380
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#3,752
of 4,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#325,554
of 438,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#58
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.