↓ Skip to main content

Meta-analysis of up to 622,409 individuals identifies 40 novel smoking behaviour associated genetic loci

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Psychiatry, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
57 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Meta-analysis of up to 622,409 individuals identifies 40 novel smoking behaviour associated genetic loci
Published in
Molecular Psychiatry, January 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41380-018-0313-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Mesut Erzurumluoglu, Mengzhen Liu, Victoria E. Jackson, Daniel R. Barnes, Gargi Datta, Carl A. Melbourne, Robin Young, Chiara Batini, Praveen Surendran, Tao Jiang, Sheikh Daud Adnan, Saima Afaq, Arpana Agrawal, Elisabeth Altmaier, Antonis C. Antoniou, Folkert W. Asselbergs, Clemens Baumbach, Laura Bierut, Sarah Bertelsen, Michael Boehnke, Michiel L. Bots, David M Brazel, John C. Chambers, Jenny Chang-Claude, Chu Chen, Janie Corley, Yi-Ling Chou, Sean P. David, Rudolf A. de Boer, Christiaan A. de Leeuw, Joe G. Dennis, Anna F. Dominiczak, Alison M. Dunning, Douglas F. Easton, Charles Eaton, Paul Elliott, Evangelos Evangelou, Jessica D. Faul, Tatiana Foroud, Alison Goate, Jian Gong, Hans J. Grabe, Jeff Haessler, Christopher Haiman, Göran Hallmans, Anke R. Hammerschlag, Sarah E. Harris, Andrew Hattersley, Andrew Heath, Chris Hsu, William G. Iacono, Stavroula Kanoni, Manav Kapoor, Jaakko Kaprio, Sharon L. Kardia, Fredrik Karpe, Jukka Kontto, Jaspal S. Kooner, Charles Kooperberg, Kari Kuulasmaa, Markku Laakso, Dongbing Lai, Claudia Langenberg, Nhung Le, Guillaume Lettre, Anu Loukola, Jian’an Luan, Pamela A. F. Madden, Massimo Mangino, Riccardo E. Marioni, Eirini Marouli, Jonathan Marten, Nicholas G. Martin, Matt McGue, Kyriaki Michailidou, Evelin Mihailov, Alireza Moayyeri, Marie Moitry, Martina Müller-Nurasyid, Aliya Naheed, Matthias Nauck, Matthew J. Neville, Sune Fallgaard Nielsen, Kari North, Markus Perola, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Giorgio Pistis, Tinca J. Polderman, Danielle Posthuma, Neil Poulter, Beenish Qaiser, Asif Rasheed, Alex Reiner, Frida Renström, John Rice, Rebecca Rohde, Olov Rolandsson, Nilesh J. Samani, Maria Samuel, David Schlessinger, Steven H Scholte, Robert A. Scott, Peter Sever, Yaming Shao, Nick Shrine, Jennifer A. Smith, John M. Starr, Kathleen Stirrups, Danielle Stram, Heather M. Stringham, Ioanna Tachmazidou, Jean-Claude Tardif, Deborah J. Thompson, Hilary A. Tindle, Vinicius Tragante, Stella Trompet, Valerie Turcot, Jessica Tyrrell, Ilonca Vaartjes, Andries R van der Leij, Peter van der Meer, Tibor V. Varga, Niek Verweij, Henry Völzke, Nicholas J. Wareham, Helen R. Warren, David R. Weir, Stefan Weiss, Leah Wetherill, Hanieh Yaghootkar, Ersin Yavas, Yu Jiang, Fang Chen, Xiaowei Zhan, Weihua Zhang, Wei Zhao, Wei Zhao, Kaixin Zhou, Philippe Amouyel, Stefan Blankenberg, Mark J. Caulfield, Rajiv Chowdhury, Francesco Cucca, Ian J. Deary, Panos Deloukas, Emanuele Di Angelantonio, Marco Ferrario, Jean Ferrières, Paul W. Franks, Tim M. Frayling, Philippe Frossard, Ian P. Hall, Caroline Hayward, Jan-Håkan Jansson, J. Wouter Jukema, Frank Kee, Satu Männistö, Andres Metspalu, Patricia B. Munroe, Børge Grønne Nordestgaard, Colin N. A. Palmer, Veikko Salomaa, Naveed Sattar, Timothy Spector, David Peter Strachan, Pim van der Harst, Eleftheria Zeggini, Danish Saleheen, Adam S. Butterworth, Louise V. Wain, Goncalo R. Abecasis, John Danesh, Martin D. Tobin, Scott Vrieze, Dajiang J. Liu, Joanna M. M. Howson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 218 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 11%
Other 12 6%
Student > Master 12 6%
Professor 11 5%
Other 40 18%
Unknown 78 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 6%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Other 41 19%
Unknown 88 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2023.
All research outputs
#915,681
of 25,489,496 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Psychiatry
#784
of 4,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,166
of 445,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Psychiatry
#16
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,489,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.